Cyber security assessment and compliance

Cyber Security Risk Assessment Services: Find Your Real Risks, Then Meet Every Framework Once

A cyber security risk assessment for organizations that need a clear picture of risk and several frameworks to satisfy. We assess your controls against NIST CSF 2.0, test what matters, and map findings to ISO 27001, SOC 2, PCI DSS, HIPAA, NIS2, or DORA. You get one risk-ranked roadmap in 6–12 weeks.

Cyber security with Accredify Global
6–12 wksTypical assessment and roadmap
6NIST CSF 2.0 functions assessed
10+Frameworks we map to
1Roadmap across all of them
23+Technical experts
71Countries covered
NIST CSF 2.0
Six Functions, One Baseline
Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover
TESTED
VAPT Where It Matters
Vulnerability and penetration testing
MAPPED
ISO 27001, SOC 2, PCI DSS and More
Assess once, reuse the evidence
TAILORED
One Tailored Proposal
After a free scoping review
In plain terms

What Is a Cyber Security Risk Assessment?

A cyber security risk assessment identifies the systems and data that matter most, the threats they face, and how well your controls protect them. Each risk is rated by likelihood and impact. The result is a ranked list of risks and a plan to reduce them, in the order that matters to your business.

Almost every security framework starts here. ISO 27001, SOC 2, PCI DSS, HIPAA, NIS2, and DORA all expect a documented risk assessment. Customers ask for it too, through security questionnaires and vendor reviews. Doing it well once saves you repeating it for every framework.

Accredify Global's cyber security assessment services go beyond a spreadsheet of risks. We interview owners, test controls on real systems, and coordinate technical testing where it adds value. Findings are mapped to the frameworks you need, so one assessment feeds all of them.

AssetsSystems, data, and suppliers that matter most
ThreatsRansomware, phishing, cloud misconfiguration, and insiders
ControlsTested in practice, not only read in policy
RoadmapRisks ranked, owners named, and dates set
Where the rules stand

Cyber Security Compliance in 2026: The Deadlines That Are Now Live

Several major cyber rules moved from planning to enforcement in the last 18 months. DORA has applied to EU financial entities since 17 January 2025. NIS2 is now in national law across most EU Member States. All PCI DSS v4 requirements became mandatory on 31 March 2025.

In the US, the CMMC program entered Phase 1 in defense contracts on 10 November 2025. From 10 November 2026, third-party Level 2 assessments become the default for many contracts involving controlled unclassified information. Public companies have also had to disclose material cyber incidents on Form 8-K since December 2023. A current cyber security risk assessment is the common starting point for all of them.

17 Jan 2025DORA applies to EU financial entities
31 Mar 2025All PCI DSS v4 requirements in force
10 Nov 2026CMMC Phase 2: Level 2 third-party assessments

Sources: NIST Cybersecurity Framework · PCI SSC: v4 requirements · CMMC phase timeline

Choosing your frameworks

Which Cyber Security Framework Do You Need?

Start from who is asking. Most organizations need two or three of these, and one assessment can cover them together.

If this applies to youThe framework usually asked forOur service
Enterprise customers want a certificateISO 27001ISO 27001 certification
US customers want an attestation reportSOC 2 (or SOC 1 for financial reporting)SOC 1 and SOC 2 reports
You take or process card paymentsPCI DSS v4.0.1PCI DSS compliance services
You handle US health informationHIPAA, sometimes HITRUSTHIPAA compliance and HITRUST certification
You serve US government or defenseNIST CSF, NIST SP 800-171, CMMCNIST compliance services
You are an EU essential or important entityNIS2NIS2 compliance readiness
You are an EU financial entity or its ICT supplierDORADORA readiness
You process personal data of EU or Brazilian residentsGDPR, LGPD, ISO 27701GDPR, LGPD, and ISO 27701
You build or deploy AI systemsISO 42001, EU AI ActAI governance and compliance
Scope

What We Assess: The Six NIST CSF 2.0 Functions

NIST CSF 2.0 gives a neutral structure that maps cleanly to every other framework. We test each function against evidence.

FunctionWhat it coversWhat we test
GovernStrategy, roles, policy, and supply chain riskBoard oversight, risk appetite, named owners, and supplier security terms
IdentifyAssets, risks, and improvementAsset and data inventories, the risk register, and cloud accounts in scope
ProtectAccess, awareness, data security, and platform securityMFA coverage, privileged access, encryption, patching, and backups
DetectMonitoring and analysisLog coverage, alert handling, and time to detect in a scenario
RespondIncident management and reportingPlaybooks, escalation, and regulatory reporting deadlines
RecoverRestoring normal operationsRestore tests, recovery objectives, and crisis communication

NIST CSF 2.0 was published in February 2024 and added the Govern function. Our NIST compliance services page covers full CSF and SP 800-53 assessments.

Evidence, not assumptions

Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Testing Within the Cyber Security Assessment

Interviews and documents show what should happen. Testing shows what actually happens. We add it where it changes the risk picture.

Testing we can include

External testingInternet-facing systems, web applications, and APIs
Internal testingNetwork, Active Directory, and lateral movement paths
Cloud reviewAWS, Azure, and Google Cloud configuration
Segmentation testingFor PCI DSS and other scoped environments
Phishing simulationStaff awareness, measured

How testing is delivered

  • Scoped and authorized in writing before any test starts
  • Delivered through our VAPT service, with internal resources or qualified specialist partners
  • Findings validated to remove false positives
  • Each finding linked to a risk in your register
  • Retesting after fixes, where agreed

Test results also support SOC 2, PCI DSS, and ISO 27001 evidence requests.

What we see most often

Common Findings From Cyber Security Assessments

The same gaps appear across sectors and company sizes. Most are cheap to fix once they are visible.

FindingWhy it mattersTypical fix
MFA missing on some admin or remote accessStolen passwords remain a leading way into networksEnforce MFA everywhere, starting with privileged and cloud console access
Backups never restored in a testRansomware recovery fails when backups are incomplete or reachable by attackersIsolated backups and a scheduled restore test with recorded results
No complete asset or cloud inventoryYou cannot protect systems you do not know aboutAutomated discovery and an owner for every system
Logs collected but not reviewedAttacks go unnoticed for weeksAlert rules for key events and a named reviewer
Suppliers with broad accessA supplier breach becomes your breachAccess limited by need, security terms in contracts, and yearly reviews
Incident plan never rehearsedRegulatory deadlines of 24 or 72 hours are missedA tabletop exercise with legal, communications, and leadership

Each finding in your report links to the framework requirements it affects, so one fix can close gaps in several places.

Checklist

Cyber Security Risk Assessment Checklist: Ten Questions to Answer First

If you cannot answer one of these with evidence, it belongs on your roadmap.

Governance and visibility

  • Does your board or leadership review cyber risk at least yearly?
  • Do you have a current inventory of systems, data, and cloud accounts?
  • Is there a risk register with owners and review dates?
  • Do you know which suppliers could disrupt you if breached?
  • Do you know which regulations and customer contracts set your security duties?

Controls and response

  • Is multi-factor authentication on for all remote and admin access?
  • Have you restored a critical system from backup in the last year?
  • Was your last penetration test within 12 months?
  • Could you meet a 24- or 72-hour regulatory reporting deadline?
  • Are critical patches applied within a set, measured time?
How it works

How Our Cyber Security Assessment Services Work

Six stages from scoping call to a roadmap your leadership can approve.

Scope & frameworksSystems, sites, cloud, and the frameworks you must meet.
Asset & threat reviewWhat matters most, and what threatens it.
Control testingThe six NIST CSF 2.0 functions, checked on evidence.
Technical testingVAPT and cloud review, where in scope.
Risk-ranked roadmapRisks scored and mapped to each framework.
Leadership briefingA summary your board or leadership can act on.

Not sure which frameworks apply, or where to start? A free scoping review answers that first.

Book a free scoping review
Why Accredify Global

What Our Cybersecurity Compliance Services Improve

The outcomes security, risk, and leadership teams care about most.

One view of risk

A single register and roadmap across every framework, instead of separate projects that repeat the same questions.

Priorities you can defend

Risks ranked by likelihood and business impact, so budget goes to what reduces risk most.

Faster questionnaires

Current evidence ready for the security reviews your customers send.

A clear path to certification

When you are ready, a direct route to ISO 27001, SOC 2, or ISO 22301 business continuity.

Cost and timeline

Cyber Security Assessment Cost and Timeline

There is no list price. The cost follows your scope, the frameworks to map, and the testing included. A free scoping review gives you a tailored proposal.

What moves the cost

  • Systems and sites — on-premises, cloud, and locations in scope
  • Frameworks — how many standards and regulations to map
  • Testing — external, internal, application, and cloud testing
  • Suppliers — critical third parties to review
  • Reuse — recent assessments, test reports, or certifications

How long it takes

Assessment and roadmap6–12 weeks, depending on scope and testing
Closing gapsSet by your roadmap and team capacity
OngoingYearly reassessment, and after major changes
Choosing a partner

How to Choose Cyber Security Assessment Services

The questions worth asking before you sign, and how Accredify Global answers them.

Question to askAccredify Global's answer
Do you test controls or only review documents?We test on evidence and systems, and add VAPT where it matters.
Can one assessment cover several frameworks?Yes. We assess against NIST CSF 2.0 and map to the rest.
Are you a QSA or a CMMC C3PAO?No. We prepare you for those assessments and coordinate them where needed.
Can you also certify us?For ISO standards, yes, as a separate service kept independent of this work. See our impartiality commitments.
Do you give legal advice?No. Where regulatory interpretation is needed, we coordinate it with your counsel.
How is it priced?A tailored proposal after a free scoping review.
Deliverables

What You Receive From a Cyber Security Risk Assessment

Risk register

Risks scored by likelihood and impact, with owners.

NIST CSF 2.0 gap assessment

Current and target state for each of the six functions.

Framework mapping

Findings mapped to ISO 27001, SOC 2, PCI DSS, and more.

Testing report

Validated VAPT findings, where testing is in scope.

Risk-ranked roadmap

Actions in priority order, with owners and dates.

Leadership briefing

A summary your board or leadership can approve.

Common questions

Frequently Asked Questions About Cyber Security Risk Assessments

Straight answers on scope, frameworks, testing, 2026 rules, cost, and timeline.

What is a cyber security risk assessment?

A cyber security risk assessment identifies the systems and data that matter most, the threats they face, and how well current controls protect them. It rates each risk by likelihood and impact. The output is a ranked list of risks and a plan to reduce them.

Why do I need a cyber security risk assessment?

Most security frameworks and regulations require one, including ISO 27001, SOC 2, NIST CSF, HIPAA, PCI DSS, NIS2, and DORA. Customers also ask for evidence of it in security questionnaires. It is the only reliable way to decide where security money should go first.

How often should a cyber security risk assessment be done?

At least once a year, and after major changes such as a new system, an acquisition, or a serious incident. Many frameworks set a yearly minimum. High-risk environments often review key risks every quarter.

What is the difference between a risk assessment and a penetration test?

A risk assessment looks across people, processes, and technology to rank risks. A penetration test is a technical exercise that tries to exploit specific systems. Penetration test results feed into the risk assessment, but one does not replace the other.

What framework do you use for cyber security risk assessments?

We usually structure the assessment around NIST CSF 2.0 and its six functions: Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover. We then map findings to the frameworks you need, such as ISO 27001, SOC 2, PCI DSS, NIS2, or DORA.

What is NIST CSF 2.0?

NIST CSF 2.0 is the Cybersecurity Framework published by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology in February 2024. It added a sixth function, Govern, to the original five. It suits organizations of any size and sector.

What are cybersecurity compliance services?

Cybersecurity compliance services help an organization meet security rules set by laws, regulators, customers, or standards. They include scoping, gap assessment, control testing, evidence preparation, and support through certification or audit.

Which cyber security framework do I need?

It depends on who is asking. Enterprise customers usually ask for SOC 2 or ISO 27001. Card payments need PCI DSS. US healthcare needs HIPAA. EU entities may face NIS2 or DORA. A scoping review confirms which apply and how to cover several at once.

Does Accredify Global do penetration testing?

Yes. Our VAPT service covers vulnerability assessment and penetration testing. We deliver it with internal resources or qualified specialist partners, depending on the technical scope.

Can a cyber security assessment help with customer security questionnaires?

Yes. An assessment gives you current, documented evidence for the questions customers ask most. It also shows where a certification such as ISO 27001, or a SOC 2 report, would answer many questionnaires at once.

Are you a CMMC C3PAO?

No. Accredify Global is not a CMMC Third-Party Assessment Organization. We help defense contractors assess readiness against NIST SP 800-171 before a C3PAO assessment.

What changed in cyber security regulation for 2026?

Several rules now bite. NIS2 is in national law across most of the EU, and DORA has applied to EU financial entities since January 2025. PCI DSS v4.0.1 is fully in force. CMMC Level 2 third-party assessments become the default for many defense contracts from 10 November 2026.

How much does a cyber security risk assessment cost?

The cost depends on the number of systems, sites, and cloud environments in scope, the frameworks to map, and whether testing is included. Accredify Global reviews your scope for free and sends a tailored proposal.

How long does a cyber security risk assessment take?

Most Accredify Global cyber security assessments and roadmaps take 6 to 12 weeks, depending on scope and testing. Closing the gaps then follows your roadmap.

Does Accredify Global also certify ISO 27001?

Yes, ISO 27001 certification is a separate service. To stay impartial, we do not certify a management system that we helped design. If you want both, we plan the work so the assessment and the certification audit stay independent.

What do we receive from a cyber security assessment?

You receive a risk register, a gap assessment against NIST CSF 2.0 and your chosen frameworks, and testing results where in scope. You also get a risk-ranked roadmap and a summary for your leadership or board.

Free cyber security scoping review

Start With a Cyber Security Risk Assessment That Serves Every Framework You Need

Tell us about your systems, customers, and the rules you face. We'll confirm which frameworks apply, recommend a timeline, and send a tailored proposal.

Book your free scoping review →